Worcester’s Dual Tax Classification System

Every year, the Worcester City Council meets at the end of November or early December to set the property tax rates for the following fiscal year. For FY26, the Council voted for the highest commercial rate. The Chamber will continue to advocate on behalf of the community to narrow this gap over time, to assist our employers, promote job creation, and revitalize our Downtown and neighborhood business districts.

Worcester’s FY2026 Real Estate Tax Rates are Residential $13.28 per $1000 Assessed Value & Commercial $29.06 per $1000 Assessed Value

Advocation

While most assume the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce advocates for an overnight vote to get to a single rate, the fact is that it is not the case. While the Chamber does hope to get to a single rate at some point, we understand the need to work with the Council to make a 10-year plan to get there incrementally.

Municipalities across the Commonwealth and locally that have (or recently had) dual tax rates have implemented long-term plans to gradually narrow their tax gaps. For example, Fitchburg and Leominster have both moved to a single tax rate to retain their existing businesses while adding new businesses. Also, Auburn and Clinton, the other two municipalities in Central Massachusetts, have continued to close the tax gap, recognizing the tax benefits of having more business in their towns.

Just in our region, for example, Webster made and stuck to a 10-year plan to get to a single rate.  In 2018 that plan was executed, and they are now helping their commercial tax base grow. Before 2018, Webster had 19 vacant storefronts in its downtown corridor; today, those vacancies are down to six. The vibrancy of that commercial corridor has grown exponentially with shops and restaurants and has made it a destination for not just its residents but the surrounding communities.

In 1984 when the dual tax was enacted here in Worcester, 35% of the tax base came from our commercial/industrial sectors.  Since that time, the widening of the gap has disincentivized businesses to come or stay in the city, and now only 21% of the tax revenue comes from the commercial/industrial sectors. Ironically, the previous votes to widen the tax gap have caused companies to leave for surrounding communities, putting this void on the backs of the residents. While this incremental step is one in the right direction, we must continue to be vigilant and help raise that commercial tax base.